Read: 995
Original text:
The essay was an amalgamation of different ideas that were not fully developed. The author had a few interesting thoughts, but they were not cohesively connected to each other and did not build up to a clear argument or . There were some good phrases scattered throughout the piece which showed potential for insightful writing, however these did not form into coherent sentences.
The structure of the essay felt disjointed. The beginning was confusing as there wasn't a smooth transition from one idea to another. In many instances, it seemed like the author's thoughts were jumbled and needed better organization.
There were also issues with and grammar throughout. It appeared that spelling errors and inconsistent usage of tenses could have been reduced through more editing or proofreading. This distracted from the message being conveyed and made the essay harder to follow for the reader.
A few instances also showed a lack of knowledge in certn fields mentioned, which might have influenced the clarity of points being made.
Lastly, the overall tone was quite informal and perhaps too conversational for an academic setting. It would benefit from adopting more formal language and academic rigor throughout the piece.
Revised text:
The article presented a fusion of diverse ideas that were insufficiently polished or fully developed. The writer exhibited some intriguing thoughts, but these concepts lacked cohesion and fled to construct a robust argumentative structure or definitive . Though there were promising phrases distributed across the document indicating a potential for insightful writing, they did not coalesce into logically sequential sentences.
The essay's organizational framework felt fragmented with an abrupt transition from one topic to another at the beginning, rering it confusing for readers. It seemed that the author’s thoughts were disordered and required more systematic organization to ensure a smooth flow of ideas.
There were notable issues pertning to and grammar scattered . Errors in spelling or inconsistent tense usage could have been minimized with additional editing or proofreading efforts. This detracted from the clarity of the message, making it harder for readers to follow through their arguments.
In several instances, the essay revealed a lack of familiarity with certn disciplines referenced, which might affect the comprehensiveness and precision of points being made.
Moreover, the general tone was rather informal and conversational, potentially unsuitable for academic contexts. The text would benefit from adopting more formal and adhering to higher standards of academic rigor .
In summary, while the article demonstrated potential in certn areas, it required substantial refinement in terms of structure coherence, language consistency, clarity, depth of knowledge application, and adherence to formal writing conventions for a professional academic setting.
This article is reproduced from: https://www.qmhinc.com/future-trends-in-boltless-shelving/
Please indicate when reprinting from: https://www.il44.com/Shelf_warehouse/Essay_Need_Coherence_Editing.html
Coherent Essay Structure Improvement Enhanced Language Usage Skills Academic Rigor in Writing Practice Clarity and Depth of Knowledge Application SEO Optimization for Professional Contexts Streamlined Argumentative Framework Development